*Title inspired by conversations with my friend Gerard!
I thought I would do a compare and contrast post on my three
pocket filofaxes: Aston, Cavendish and Portland. Only one of them is in use,
the Aston, but I know I find it interesting to see other models, especially
when browsing eBay (when there just aren’t enough pictures usually!).
Overall size/look
Here’s a picture of them all together. Although they are all
supposed to be pocket sized, the Aston looks bigger (and not just because it is
stuffed!). The other two are sleeker-looking.
|
Clockwise from top left: Cavendish, Aston, Portland |
Looking at the reverse, you can see that the Cavendish, like
it’s big brother, has an external zipped pocket. The Cavendish is the only one
to have a full exterior pocket that would be useful for keeping paper money in.
|
Clockwise from top left: Cavendish, Aston, Portland |
Leather
The leather on the Aston is pebbled and it has the seams and
contrast stitching, making it perhaps a bit fussy-looking. It is however a
fabulous colour! It’s called Orchid, but I would have said mauve as I would
have known what that colour was (I have a lot of orchids and none of them are
this colour!). It has a matte/silk finish rather than a shiny finish. The
leather is soft, but not as soft as my Portlands. If you own a Finchley, it’s
quite similar to that, except a little less ‘spongy’-feeling. Most of the
interior is leather, except lining the pockets.
The Cavendish has smooth leather, with much more of a shine
to it. The stitching is black, not contrast. Again, most of the interior is
leather, except for lining the pockets.The leather is firmer than either of my
Portlands – it’s probably the stiffest leather on any of my filofaxes.
The Portland is butter-soft and the leather is easy to grip –
it seems to have a higher friction than other leathers. It’s hard to describe –
it almost sticks to your skin (in a nice way!!). It is leather and fabric
inside. It’s fairly floppy, but that might be age-related.
“Flattability”
As you can see from the following pictures, the Portland
wins hands down on this! The Aston is somewhere in the middle and the Cavendish
is hopeless. The Portland, even unloaded, lies as flat as a pancake. The Aston
was given some ‘training’ a while back but is still pretty reluctant to lie
flat. The Cavendish… well. What can I say? It seems to open naturally to about
45 degrees and even with persuasion won’t lie flat.
|
Aston trying to convince me it lies flat... |
|
Cavendish convincing no-one it can lie flat! |
|
Portland - flat as a pancake! |
Interior pockets and features
The Aston has 4 credit card slots on the interior left hand
side, with a full-length pocket behind (that’s my half-marathon training plan
poking out!). I found the pocket too stiff (with my cards in) to get paper
money in and out easily (hence the
zip-lock bag hack).
The inside right has a zipped pocket which is fabric lined.
It can be a little fiddly to get coins out, but is okay.
|
Zipped pocket in the Aston |
The Cavendish has the most pockets of all of them. On the
inside left, there is the same set-up as the Aston, although the edges of the credit
card slots are better finished in the Cavendish. The pocket behind is leather
and fabric, like the Aston. On the inside right, there is another full-height
pocket. There is also an exterior pocket that runs the full width of the
filofax and an external zipped pocket. The full-width pocket is quite useful but
the zipped pocket is pretty fiddly to get things out of, I find.
|
Cavendish, credit cards and full-height pocket |
|
Cavendish, full-height pocket on the right |
|
Full-width exterior pocket |
The Portland has a gusseted pocket on the inside left, which
makes a) holding a reasonable number of coins and b) getting coins in and out,
an absolute breeze. I wish all filofaxes came with a gusseted pocket. On the
inside right there are four credit card slots – again very well edged and
curved, rather than straight. This, along with the softer leather make
accessing the cards easier. Behind the card slot is a full-height pocket.
|
Gusseted pocket |
|
Curved credit card slots |
Ring size
This is the deal-breaker for me. If the Portland had 19mm
rings, it would win hands down. But,
it, like the Cavendish, has 15mm rings. I like to carry lots of stuff in my
day-to-day filofaxes, which makes both the Portland and the Cavendish more
likely than not to stay in a drawer, at least for the time being. You can see from the early pictures how
stuffed my Aston is. I couldn’t carry so much with either of the other two, and
although the Cavendish would be a zip-lock pocket down as I could put paper money in the external
full-width pocket, I would still find them too small, which is a shame.
So why would the Portland win over the Cavendish? After all,
the Cavendish has more pockets… it’s the feel of it. That butter-softness and complete
flattability wins me over. I just wish it had 19mm rings! Since the Aston is both a delicately pretty colour and has 19mm rings, that's what I'm using.
I hope my reviews of the three pocket filofaxes have been helpful.