Showing posts with label Aston. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aston. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 February 2014

Pockets, pockets, pockets

Well, I gave myself a stern talking to after the last yearning and convinced myself that I should stay in a personal size and that if I really, really needed a change of scenery with it, I should move into the pink one or into a Holborn.
But the pocket “itch” is still there! The thing is, I think I know what the ideal pocket layout would be and I don’t think it exists in any binder.
I want:
  • At least 4, easy-to-get-things-in-and-out-of card slots
  • At least one other pocket for things like stamps
  • A zipped pocket (for the other cards that don’t sit in a card-holder or in the card slots)
  • Flat-as-a-bat floppiness
  • 19mm rings
  • A back pocket that runs across the full width of the binder to put paper money in

Other pockets would be good as long as I can get things in and out of them reasonably easily.

So how do my current stash of pocket-sized binders fare?

Model
No. card-slots?
Other pocket(s)?
Zipped pocket?
Flat-as-a-bat?
19mm rings?
Back pocket?
Aston
4
1 full-height
yes
no
yes
no
Baroque

5
3 full-height plus note-pad pocket

yes

yes

yes

no
Cavendish
4
2 full-height
yes (on back)
no
no – 15mm
yes
Classic
4
2 full-height
yes
no
yes
no
Mulberry (Loki)
4
2 full-height
yes (but v small)
mostly
no -15mm
no
Portland
4
1 full-height
yes
yes
no – 15mm
no
Urban (possibly)

4
1 full-height plus note-pad pocket
yes (on back)
?

yes

yes


You’ll see added to the table an Urban, which I don’t actually have as yet, but am bidding a miniscule amount on, on eBay. It might have the layout and functionality I want (I would need to see how flat-as-a-bat it is if I win it) but will I love it? It’s not leather and it’s a bit dull-looking. I suppose if I win it, I could potentially decorate it so that it looks less drab.

Sunday, 23 December 2012

Pros and cons of all my binders


Well, not all my binders. That would be daft. And a massive, massive blog post. I’ll just focus on the “usual squeezes”: the Baroques, the Cavendish, the Holborn(s), the Mulberry agendas, the pocket Baroque and the pocket Aston. What do I love about them? What do I want to change about them? Will I sell them (daft question. We all know the answer is going to be no, possibly stretching to a mmm, maybe I could sell it… maybe…).

Binder
What do I love?
What would I change?
Will I be selling it/them?
Pink and turquoise Baroques
Colour
Interior embossing
6 card holders
Full height pocket behind card slots
Notepad slot in back

Add another full height pocket (like the Malden) behind the notepad slot
Don’t be daft
Brown Holborn
All those card slots
All those pockets
Contrast stitching (um, actually I did change it)
The full-height pockets nearest the rings are tricky
The zipped pocket is a bit tricky too

Hmm… maybe?
Wine Holborn
All those card slots
All those pockets
Contrast stitching
The full-height pockets nearest the rings are tricky
The zipped pocket is a bit tricky too

Jeez – I’ve only just got it! No…
Black Cavendish
The 8 card slots (yes! 8!)
The 1.25” rings (yes – 1.25”!!)
The pockets in the rear

The colour – black’s a bit… dark and lacking in colour
The zipped pocket on the cover’s a bit pointless

Ha ha ha ha ha!
 No
Pocket Aston
The size
The colour
More card slots
The zipped pocket wasn’t that useful

No
Pocket Baroque
The size
The card slots
The embossed interior
The notepad slot

The colour – pink or teal would be better…
The zipped pocket is pointless

No
Indie
(brown Mulberry agenda)
The size
The quality
The beaten leather
More card slots
The vertical pockets to be a little further from the rings or have the shaped edge

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
 No

Red
(red Mulberry agenda)
The size
The quality
The colour
More card slots
The extra slip pocket that Indie has
Not to be so shiny (?)

Er… no… maybe…? No… Don’t know…

I have come to the realisation that I like:
  • lots of pockets
  • lots of card slots
  • colour
At least that’s good to realise so it might curb my binder-buying habits.

[ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha… who am I kidding???]

Maybe it will help me decide which binder to start 2013 in...

Sunday, 27 May 2012

Small change in my filofax, big difference

I have been muttering about “approaching planner fail” for a while, coming to the conclusion that:
a) I was being distracted by a colour clash in the diary (cream and purple not working so well)
b) I wasn’t using Miss Aston properly
c) I was being distracted by Mr Holborn

I finally decided that I would use Miss Aston until 31st May and then switch to Mr Holborn. So, with only a week to go, am I impatient to make the switch??

Er… no.

I know, fickle female and all, but, I made one smallish change to Miss Aston and as a result, things are working again. What did I do??
I made a new diary for myself and printed it on white paper and stopped using the 2DPP I had made myself.

Okay, I realise that might not have enough detail for some of you, so here’s a compare and contrast of the Old System and the New System:

Old System:
A list of projects, broken down into ‘Next actions’.
A list of other (non-project based) to-do on a giant, largely unsorted list in front of the project sheets.
A year of monthly goals sheets
A few months of weekly goals sheets
Almost a year of WO2P
A week of 2DPP

In my weekly review, I would (along with reviewing and reflecting on the past week):
1) take out the used 2PPD sheets and file or bin them
2) add a new week’s worth of 2PPD sheets
3) transfer scheduled things from the WO2P to the 2DPP
4) add things from the next action lists/monthly goals sheets to my weekly goals sheet

Each morning I was at home (rather than at work), I would plan what I was doing in the day, moving things from the weekly list onto the 2DPP sheet into timed slots. If I thought I would have time, I would also schedule other things to clear off my giant to-do list.

Advantages of this system:
I knew what I was supposed to be doing all the time.
Lots of things got done.

Disadvantages of this system:
Miss Aston was a little plump.
I felt like my free time wasn’t really free, but planned to death.
Although I liked my home-designed 2DPP sheets and WO2P sheets, I hated the colour paper I was using. I also couldn’t work out how to orientate the 2DPP – time and tasks facing each other (making a day span two separate sheets in the filofax) or a single page covering a day (times on one side, tasks on the other). I liked to have them facing one another, but then didn’t like the fact that a day was split over different sheets of paper.
[in my personal size filofax this isn’t a problem as I use DPP not 2DPP but in the personal, that was too small]

My new system has such a small tweak, yet has moved me from being close to planner fail to now being happy with my set-up. I adapted the Advanced TM week to view for pocket size from the Philofaxy site, to halve the number of tasks and add in a Coming Up section (although the Coming Up is hand-written in the picture below, it's now been incorporated into the file!). Incidentally, my life really isn't this empty - I just chose empty weeks to photograph, so I didn't have to pixilate sensitive/private stuff!
Click on any picture to enlarge.

New diary format - amended TM from Philofaxy.

Old WO2P diary - cream-coloured paper clash!

Old 2PPD
New system:
Projects to next action sheets (as before)
To-do sheets (as before)
A year of monthly goals sheets (as before)
WO1P diary + To-do (home-made)
Scraps of paper to ‘plan’ the day

In my weekly review, I (along with reviewing and reflecting on the past week):
1) transfer scheduled things from the next action lists/monthly goals sheets to the to-do sheet facing my WO1P

Each morning I was at home (rather than at work), I would look at the list and (if I felt like I needed to) use a bit of scrap paper to plan out what/when. I guess I could use a DPP for this and not have the 2PPD issue I have. On many days, I just left my filofax open in a visible place and ticked things off as I did them.

Advantages of this system:
My weekly planning takes less time
I’m not transcribing things as many times
I like the paper I have my diary on
Stuff is getting done but I’m not feeling so ‘planned to death’
I can fit the whole year of WO1P + to-do in, and Miss Aston looks positively sylph-like

Disadvantages of this system:
Haven’t come across any yet…

Now, I have to say, the ‘task into time slot’ method works brilliantly when I’m at work and also when I have lots of specific-timed things at home, but at the moment, days off work are fairly empty, especially now that I have stopped training for a half-marathon! Consequently, I have a list of stuff that needs doing in a week relating to projects plus other things that need doing that week. Generally, there’s no specific date these need doing (never mind a specific time) but if there is, I make a note of it.
Then on each day I’m at home, I check for appointments/specific-timed things (usually none), check what still needs doing on my weekly list and if anything else has cropped up and just do the tasks!

It’s made me realise that if/when I move back into the personal size, then the best thing for me is an enhanced TM Week per View (as per Philofaxy!). Which of course, has the added bonus of being free and easy to print at home on whatever colour paper I like!

Has anyone else found that a small tweak to their set-up has made a huge difference? What was it?